you lost me when you said ", I couldn’t seem to fall asleep so I began to read my dragonology book" may I derect your intinton to dragonology book thoes ology books are FAKE I am sorry but it is true.
Ugh boy! Could we just leave this post well alone!! II'm aware that the dragonology book is fake. Of course I am. But most of the dragons they describe there are in lore, if you don't believe me try looking them up on the Internet. To Jahb: of course I have no physical evidence! How can I provide fossils of dragons over the Internet? This is a mere theory which I have noticed some errors in (please tell me you know the proper definition for the word 'theory' now).
Magickprince its like reading a fantasy story in which writer let his imagination runs wild.
The dragon exist as human compassion..some are older then humans therefor they are not thoughtforms..
Thousand of beings are not thoughtforms since they as all spawned from khaos.Humans created few beings but nothing worth mentioning.
They mostly "empower" astral beings and planes.
Also astral things can manifest if holding enough energy..however they are not physical when manifest but more like physical energy.
magickprince you idiot. I don't want any actual evidence shoved in my face, I want a visual attached to a document or something that verifies a fossil. Nobody brings evidence in it's physical form up to people when debating science. Also, it is no theory. You are in the realm of scientific deduction, it is merely a disproven hypothesis.
Nex, how can you be sure that they were even here to begin with? there are no bones, nothing visual to go on, only old stories that we cannot rely on at all.
1) Can we just PLEASE leave this topic alone because I need to relieve myself of stress from boarding so that I can finally think staright. 2) I'm tired of having insults bombarded at me by an insecure priss like Jahb! What I meant was when I mentioned the physical evidence, is that of course I couldn't present any physically or visually because there is no physical proof for the existance of dragons, but that doesn't necessarily mean they have never existed. We had no physical evidence for the giant squid but when we did it turned out to exist, in fact the species of dragon are more likely to have existed than any other creature that we don't have any physical evidence for because of the records.
3) I most certainly do not have logic deducted from my thinking. I'm not THAT spiritual (but I do often find science irrelevant) I wouldn't be in the school I'm in if I didn't.
4) I do have another, more lgocial and feasible theory that was written whilst I lived in England, so I could obviously have thought normally at that point. It's a theory assosciating faes with UFO lore and it is backed by alot of evidence. If any of you wish I can mail it to you, just to prove I can create feasible theories.
Just like the existence of Dragons, you can say I'm insecure all you want but that in no way means it's true. Furthermore, our Earth is millions of years old, to say that one particular creature that size has never left behind something to say they were there is absurd. We did have physical evidence for giant squids. Dead squids appeared all over the coast line of Eastern Canada and other areas. We never had a live specimen, but just recently we have footage of one. The fact that you find science irrelevent shows how intoxicated by spirituality and metaphysical aspects of life you really are. I honestly don't care, and again, they are not theories because they are not proven beyond a shadow of a doubt through the scientific method. They aren't theories, they are hypothesis'. Whatever, it's worth a shot. Show me your hypothesis. I don't understand how UFO's have to do with a shot-down theory about mythical creatures, but oh well, mail it.
Theory:
1. a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.
2. a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
3. Mathematics. a body of principles, theorems, or the like, belonging to one subject: number theory.
4. the branch of a science or art that deals with its principles or methods, as distinguished from its practice: music theory.
5. a particular conception or view of something to be done or of the method of doing it; a system of rules or principles.
6. contemplation or speculation.
7. guess or conjecture.
_____________________________
I see where you are coming from in a way. Dragons are in every culture throughout the world. However these is no physical proof, therefore there cannot be a theory because theories are based off of scientific fact.
Ex: The Big Bang Theory
The reason that the big bang theory emerged was because of the background radiation, which was constant through out the universe.
______
It is scientifically improbable that an animal could breathe fire, its body would have such intricate design it would be ironic if they died out. What can kill something that is large, can fly, and breathe fire. Sure meteor but wouldn't that mean that they were around during the times of the dinosaurs, people would never have seen them. Now let's say they existed at the same time as people. They would be recorded, most likely regarded as some sort of God because of its size and strength, and they probably would have been able to easily kill humans, which would mean that there would be fewer of us today. Another thing about them living at the same time as humans is their fossils would have been found by now. The found Lucy, the would easily have found a dragon.
