Why is that? Because they do not agree with the things you have typed up here? I am a vampire myself and I strongly disagree with the crap you have posted here. I think you need a reality check.
These are just a few that I can remember. I must say that they present their information in a way and present themselves in a way that I find believable and respectful. I was a member of one of these sites and I've talked with a good bit of the people there, and I do believe that the information they stated, being that it is all the same as the other sites I have found, is true and accurate.
those websites you've listed are the poser sites that let anyone believe they are a vampire and give false traits and support myths. I could go on a bunch of sites about magic and come across a bunch of crap that i could try to support instead of the truth that's on this website. and as for the other poster who claims to be a vampire. tell me what your definition of vampire is because i everything i've been saying can and has been proven scientifically and from what i've seen on this site, most of you beleive the myths you hear, which is exactly what i'm trying to clear up.
Actually they don't. I've been going to these sites and they are quick to ban the roll-players who go their claiming they are some all powerful being. They also do not tell everyone they are a vampire. I feel that you are to quick to judge on this. I agree that some sites will tell everyone they are a vampire, I have seen them, and I must say that I feel this is the reason that so few believe in the existence of vampires or those that could be considered vampires.
I respect your opinion and I hope that you respect mine in disagreeing with it.
1. Vampires never had to kill for blood. That in itself is a myth.
2. Yes, most of what you have described does sound like Porphyria, or some little story you found in a book.
3. A virus? A virus of any kind would mean it could be passed onto others. Vampirism is not a virus therefore I would say your claim is false.
4. I find it funny that you become so defensive at the first sign of disagreement or disbelief from the other members. This leads me to believe that you are the "poser" here. The other members hit they nail on the head with their posts.
If you wish to continue this debate with me take it to mail. I can sense that otherwise someone will get banned or gagged.
Conflicts of truths? How about everyone else is speaking them and FireVamp needs a crash course in vampirism. Have you even bothered to read what he wrote? It is the funniest thing that I have ever read in my life, next to some of the spells on this site.
You have to admit Black_Hex is right. As soon as what he said was challenged he got defensive. The only people that do that are either lying or those that enjoy conflict or both.
now you are quoting me on things i never said. i never said it was a virus. i said it was an endogenous retrovirus and to google it if you were unaware of it's meaning. and you're saying that in 112 A.D a vampire could get a willing donor just like today? if so maybe they could. i wasn't there, but based on the myths and accusations about vampires generating from that time period described them as evil. So it's common sense that a vampire had no choice but to kill for human blood.
as for the defensive part, i wasn't upset that you yourself didn't believe me, as i was upset that you are posting stuff to make others not believe. if you dont believe, i don't care, but let others decide for themselves.
