Sweetheart, I believe in a lot of things, but...I ain't a gullible person. I need proof of some sort. Even if that is just logically explaining stuff in a clear manner. If it makes the least bit of sense to me, I'll use it until it makes no sense to me. It is as simple as that.
However, you have lacked to give a clear explanation of anything. Then when this was stated more than once, you did not explain it in a new or different way, rather you simply refuted it as "we don't know what we are talking about". Within the mind many wondrous adventures can be created. I'm not saying all of yours are created, and I'm not saying all of yours aren't.
However, when you were confronted about the confusion regarding your words this last time along with the similarities to a television show, you immediately chose this route to make your words known. This isn't supporting yourself in any way. And by many accounts this actually breaks down the debate. Because you cannot explain how or why, and your words are questioned, you run. This shows another common human trait, that of fear. You fear being called out for a liar, or for being seen as what you are. Either than as a liar, or as a confused person.
By any account I will consider you confused, because you didn't explain things, which means you don't know them that well yourself and chances are, you haven't really done it much further than theory.
Rather than facing criticism, you are running away. Which shows cowardice. You cannot take that others do not believe as you do, and so, instead of explaining things clearly for the betterment of all, you run away.
As for being in denial "instead of listening, thinking, making ur own conclusions about other peoples experiences", denial of things is a far safer thing than being gullible. At least if you deny some things you won't believe in bull.
I've heard a lot of silly stuff on this site. That being said, I've also heard a lot of things that sound silly, but in fact could be true.
I treat truth in this way; if I hear something I find believeable, whether it is by evidence of the strength of the position or argument, or even just the position of respect I hold for an individual, then I will add it into my list of things I believe in. However, if I hear something that is silly, has no evidence, nor a strong position, nor a strong argument, and not even a person I respect behind it, it will automatically go into my "ignore" pile.
These are ideas and beliefs I ignore because they are not important to me in the least. Does this mean that I did not hear them? No, it simply means I treat them as false. Does this mean I didn't think about it? No, it means I thought about it and determined it to be false. Does this mean I didn't "make conclusions about other peoples experiences"? No, I came to my conclusion about them, and my conclusion was that this is false.
If you wish to make a real statement and tell me your ideas behind it, I would be willing to have a discussion with you through mail or pm or even here about *exactly* how you were able to go back in time. I am curious as to how you figure you did this to be honest.
I am usually on as SaidGuidenc, mewmew1010, or Nebibit if you wish to talk. If not, I will not worry myself over this.
