second theory

Forums ► Misc Topics ► second theory

Re: second theory
By:
Post # 31
One more thing. Energy is energy, no matter what you call it.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: second theory
By:
Post # 32
by pure water i meant clean pure water in that sense i guess i dont know how to clarify myself either
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: second theory
By:
Post # 33
Lol, its cool. I don't think any of us are adept in that sense, :D
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: second theory
By:
Post # 34
im glad i posted my theory because at first i wasnt going to but my gf told me that she thought it sounded good so now there are 4 pages of very informative comments with most supporting my theory
blessed be
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: second theory
By: / Knowledgeable
Post # 35
The theory has been kicked around before. It appears in various phrasing and different wordings elsewhere, as well.

The problem rests in the fact that a psi ball does not take up mass. It does not impact matter. A psi ball is just a focus of will. It is a spiritual energy that impacts the subconscious/conscious mind and leaves one reacting to the energy as though something is there, though there is not. Otherwise it would be quite measurable and provable to science.

If it were a physical manifestation that had mass and impacted matter it would also be impacted by gravity. In which case so would any such creation that resulted in levitation. The forces applied to levitate an object or individual would then constantly have to create a force equal to that which gravity exerts on the psi ball/platform in addition to the force gravity exerts upon the individual or object being lifted by the energy.

Any such platform would then actually make it more difficult to levitate than not using one, assuming that such a force could be created in opposition of gravity.

This force would essentially have to be a kinetic energy greater or equal to gravity or that otherwise distorts it, removing diluting/removing its impact.

As psi energy impacts only the subconscious/conscious mind, it would be rather impossible to do this.

Good thought though.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: second theory
By:
Post # 36
but if a low density psiball puts weight on your hand then that means psiballs do have weight
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: second theory
By: / Knowledgeable
Post # 37
No. It is your mind reacting to the psychic (psy = psycic) energy and causing your hand to feel weight.

In any case the rest of the argument against it providing the ability to levitate applies.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: second theory
By:
Post # 38
Smoke is unaffected by gravity, yet we can see, smell, taste, and feel it? There are many forms of energy that are not affected at all by gravity. Who's to say psi energy doesn't fall in there? What if levitation is simply forcing helium molecules to focus on/around an object? And a study, so I've heard, has been conducted proving thought can transfer/induce ion activity. There are too many things we don't know enough about, to put simply.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: second theory
By:
Post # 39
..sorry.. to discredit this theory so strongly. My original thought on levitation deals with the fact all things contain magnetic field potential, it is merely the random direction of the inner poles that nullifies them.. what if we could line them up?
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: second theory
By: / Knowledgeable
Post # 40
Smoke is actually impacted by gravity, just very slightly. It has mass and is therefore impacted by gravity. However its mass is very slight and its heat (heat rising) allows it to move upward in air currents.

The idea that an energy would possess mass would absolutely mean that it is also impacted by gravity.

The only area where this differs is at the subatomic level, where scientists are still trying to understand things. But the subatomic level variance does not allow for something in a larger scale (a person) to defy it.

If it is a variety of energy not impacted by gravity, it must still overcome or otherwise alter the impact of gravity to produce the result of levitation on something that is impacted by gravity.

For example with the magnetic stuff you were talking about, this is the concept of a bullet train. Incredibly high powered magnets are aligned so that the poles create a magnetic cushion of sorts that propels the train forward, effectively levitating it on the tracks. However the magnetic force generated must still be greater than the force of gravity, so that the train can actually be lifted.

Altering the polarity of an atom is essentially the same as removing proton and neutrons. This essentially alters the molecular composition of the material however. A molecule that has its neutrons removed to make it have positive polarity for example will not necessarily be the same thing it was with the neutron. It will also not necessarily adhere to to other molecules the same way.

Two hydrogen molecules will not combine with a oxygen molecule if their polarities are not exactly right, and so a water molecule will stop being water... it will break up into its component gases, which may also become something else.

It is all quite more complicated than one might hope at first glance.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.