I kinda went back in time

So I had made my own spell..
yeah my own spell
AND i sorta went back in time..
I said get me to 1922
I was sitting there and I heard noises.
and I just went back in time for 10 seconds.
I know its not ordinary but I just have to get some awnsers.

You can not go back into time, it makes no sence.
In the astral, there is a thing about it, but not here.
It is impossible and no one can actually do it or ever will.

So says the guy/gal on a site for 'magick' which others say does not exist. @Bdsofosdf how do you know you went back in time? just out of curiosity.

To wolfstar, people say magick does not exict, but there are few things in magic really proven.
And See that everyone will tell that it is impossible even for magic.

Hi wolfstar. You appear to be unaware that magick is actually a science that does indeed follow very specific observable laws.

Time absolutely and positively flows in only one direction for beings who exist as ourselves. We can speculate that this might not apply to an Ipsissimus or something, but since an Ipsissimus is too powerful to manifest on this realm it is quite safe to assume that Bdsofosdf is no such being. With that in mind we can conclude that Bdsofosdf did not in fact travel backward through time.

So yes, so says the gal (Wolf is female) on a forum dedicated to the science of magick.

Crowley defined Magick as "the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will."
So Magick would basically be able to do anything if you desire it or apply enough energy.Or Bdsofosdf might have been in a magick rich zone and im not saying that he went back in time, just keeping an open mind to the posibility. Also how do you know an Ipsissimus could not exist on this reality?
In the study of magick one should keep an open mind with a healthy dose of skepticism.

Read more Crowley; he also wrote of magick, "it is theoretically possible to cause in any object any change of which that object is capable by nature ". (emphasis added by me)


Liber B vel Magi (also a work of Crowley) is described as "An account of the Grade of Magus, the highest grade which it is even possible to manifest in any way whatsoever upon this plane." Magus is the 9=2 grade, just before Ipsissimus. As Ipsissimus is a higher than the "highest grade which is even possible to manifest," it's pretty safe to assume they can't manifest here either.

By nature it is possible for an object to change from one state to another making transformation of items a possibility but highly improbable. It is proven that black holes exist and as we do not know, there is a chance that wormholes might exist as well. Do not be quick to assume we know everything there is to know about this world. Every year new species are being found on this earth alone. There are a lot of things we do not know about the universe so what we might think might be simple illusions (emphasis on the might)

"By nature it is possible for an object to change from one state to another making transformation of items a possibility but highly improbable."

Not exactly true. Most living animals can really only change into one of two things; energy and soil. You can't take this fact and run with it, assuming that this then means that anything can turn into anything. Humans, for example, seem only capable of becoming non-human via death.

The existence of black holes and worm holes is irrelevant to this conversation, as is the constant discovery of new species.

Yes, I know our knowledge is not infinite and absolute. However, none of this is reason to just up and throw what we do know out the window. If we had always thrown away all non-absolute knowledge we never would have developed medicine, sanitation, science, logic, philosophy, and most other things, really.

Magick is a science. It has certain rules that we think are correct. We will adhere to the belief in these rules because absolutely nothing has ever surfaced to dismiss them, and there have been many failed attempts to do so which implies that they are in fact real and accurate. We will disregard belief in these rules once we have proof to their contrary. Groundlessly asserting otherwise is not particularly different from groundlessly asserting that gravity is a myth.

you spell the last word wrong its answers smart one