Now you are assuming that they had to kill. How amusing boy. How is it any different. Everything that has been posted is fact, other than the things you posted. Maybe you should let people decided what they want to believe. Personally I agree with Black_Hex. You are a fraud. You did make me laugh so props to you.
Adamina yes truths.
One's idea is bulletproof. If FireVamp believes in things he/she posted then for him/her that is the truth.
There is no point fighting over it.
If you don't realize that you'll be the same as those who you attack.
fine, i'll be mature about it. obviously a majority disagrees with me and though i'm not saying that i'm wrong, i'll stop trying to force what i'm saying onto you. and Wudang does have a point. reality is what each person believes to be true, and is an illusion of each person's brain and therefore different for each person. So it's impossible to say i'm wrong because in my reality, and to many others, i'm right. this is my last post on this topic and i know when i'm beaten. i at least appreciate you paying attention to the topic.
i was actually referring to many previous post. And i've done alot of research on vampires (both what I say is the truth and what others say)yet this is the first i've come across the term "high breed."
I was asked to clarify some things here for you, FireVamp, so I've gone through the thread and will be posting what I believe in reply to the things you have said. Please don't take it personally.
"Psi vampires aren't real vampires" Yes, they are. There are two types of vampires. Blood vampires drink blood, these are what you may call "real" vampires. Psi vampires manipulate energy straight from their target so that they don't need to feed, this is a development that most likely took place since vampires were hunted and were feared in many cultures. To this day, in fact, they are still hunted in some third world countries around the world. Specifically some in Africa.
To keep from making this to long, I'll just say this is in reply to Post#9 rather then quote it. Vampires never "had" to kill for blood. They chose to. It's sad to say, but if you consider the fact that their victims would have contacted authorities and had the vampire hunted, they chose to do so for their own sake. Regardless of consequences it was their choice, but I believe this is part of the reason psi vampires developed as explained in the last paragraph.
In reply to Post#12, you are right about vampires not being undead, however you are wrong about Native Americans. Most Native American stories were told to give lessons. They were the Native American's version of school. Their stories taught morales, discipline, history, etc. The Europeans who came here misinterpreted them and now what we have are the results of ignorance. Even to this day most people are filled with ignorance. I had to explain to a class of third graders AND their teacher that not all Native Americans lived in tepees, they didn't even know that much. Anyways, that's off topic.
In reply to Post#13, I think you're lost now. Succubus is a demon that feeds off the energy of sex, not blood. Vampires require life energy to correct an imbalance in their own energy. That's why they feed on blood.
In reply to Post#15, being a mod and answering questions for an author does not make you a credible source nor does being a vampire. Studying, researching, and experimenting to gain experience on this topic is what would make you a credible source. I've made several websites making me the administrator of about eight or so. I've done well on several other sites making me a moderator on about four. Although I was promoted to moderator because those admins consider me a credible source, that is only their opinion so saying that would be to say that one person considers me a credible source and happens to own a website therefore I am a credible source. Do you see the lack of credibility in that? Oh, and about the author, I am a vampire and an author. That doesn't mean I know everything either.
In reply to Post#17, would you mind clarifying what those other things are? Aside from energy, there are proteins and minerals in blood, but that can be found in various meats. Vampires don't "need" blood for anything other then the energy. If that were the case then a vampire would simply be a person who "prefers" to drink blood rather then eat what some might call normal food.
In reply to Post#20, those are just posers, not "goth" posers. There are preppies, nerds, emos, and even jocks who may think the same thing and call themselves vampires. Actually, rather then call them "posers" I think simply an ignorant person would be a better term for those that I mentioned. The posers are the ones who try to act like vampires, but the same goes for them.
In reply to Post#24, it sounds to me like you just call anything that doesn't agree with your personal beliefs a "poser" and I think your loyalty to that site may be the main reason you were promoted to moderator. I think most administrators prefer loyal site-junkies over knowledgeable moderators when looking for people to promote only their website and ensure nobody breaks rules.
In reply to Post#30, vampirism is a genetically inherited disease. Nothing more and nothing less. They did have a choice in whether or not they would kill, but they chose the safer route for themselves. Obviously not the safer path for their victim. They killed, therefore they were murderers. That may not be what you call common sense, but that is the legal definition. And, as you pointed out, vampires could live on rare steaks. Why didn't they back then? They preferred human blood and so chose to take it by force when they could. They could have just as easily found animals and fed on them. People did eat meat back then.
In reply to Post#31, your words contradict yourself. If you don't want others posting their beliefs, why do you post yours? Post a list of sources, not just one site, and let others do their own research if you are so dedicated to letting them believe what they want to rather then what you do.
In reply to Post#35, again you prove yourself wrong. That wasn't your last post.
In reply to Post#39, although I have seen that as well I must wonder why. They claim to have a disease even though they don't have it and chose a type that doesn't drink blood so that they won't have to either. It's like faking an injury, lol, I just answered my own curiosity. They do it for the attention. You know, there are also a lot of people who claim other things for attention. Most commonly "the truth" is claimed.
Finally, I'll end my post with what I have found to be one of the most accurate sources for real vampires. Their only flaw is the use of the word "sanguinarian" or "sanguine vampire" which is the improper term for a blood vampire.
In the real world the term "half vampire" or "dampire" especially would be considered improperly used. Most real vampires are not what would be called purebred(entirely vampiric family) so they are all simply referred to as vampires. A purebred is simply a vampire who's entire family, or at least the majority for as far back as was recorded, is vampiric.
Sanguinarius.org is most likely the most accurate source on the internet today or at least in the top three.
Some critisism for your site, FireVamp. I checked the info on vampires. Although some of it was accurate, most of it was hardly thought through. I also checked several of the other pages and found them hard to read due to the constant use of dark colors on dark colors. It definitely needs some work, perhaps a professional website designer, and some informed and experienced vampires to write out the information. I definitely advise those wishing to learn about vampires to stick to sanguinarius.org.
