Hence is the original purpose of this site; before the chat, mods, and all the covens. To post and share spells.
Re: Spellcasters Removal By: dianawm
Post # 42 Aug 21, 2011
okay i get that but then theres like a bunch of fluffy spells
Re: Spellcasters Removal By: Nallius
Post # 43 Aug 21, 2011
Must I explain supply and demand once more or do we get it?
Pet isn't going to break his neck to remove a bunch of spells or edit everythign that pops on his website. Not only that, but this IS a website, not an ancient coven with strict values, it's a website. Administration was originally concerned with what was, I believe, an experiment to see how a site like this would turn out, he gets a lot of traffic (what site owners want) with popular, desired spells like black magic, and shapeshifting.
supply and demand for those that want to learn, for them to hopefully notice and learn what can and can't be done as they mature or possibly take a real interest. Out of the extra 10 people joining 1-3 may leave to take it serious another 1 to 3 may just delete straight away the rest will join spell casters with some hardly logging on. Spell Caster is the advertisement for the site, the impossible always sounds more facinating then what isn't.
Re: Spellcasters Removal By: Draggy_
Post # 45 Aug 22, 2011
I couldn't agree more. :)
Re: Spellcasters Removal By: Bardou
Post # 46 Aug 23, 2011
I agree with Lumaria and Draggy. I've been on this site for years and I find what they say to be the most accurate.
Re: Spellcasters Removal By: Nallius
Post # 47 Aug 23, 2011
Lol What's funny is I feel mindless debates like this are entertaining to most people. It is to me. Complaining about Spellcasters is useless, I think most people in here realize that, but sometimes it's good to get your opinions out in the open. If your opinion differs from older members, because of lack of knowledge on the website, so what? Not like we have to defend Spellcasters or anything, it's in no danger. All is good, I think a little rant or "belly aching" here and there as long as it's not hurting anyone specific (hopefully no members from Spellcasters was offended by what was said in here) is good for the mind.
SoM is a place that if you bottle things up too much, it'll give ya gray hairs.
But anyway, I agreed with Bardou, who is agreeing with Draggy, who also agreed with Lumaria. Spellcasters is here for a reason, and the coven really isn't all that bad. The members don't have the high misbehavior rates you'd expect, and we do have the spell ranking system now for a reason.
Re: Spellcasters Removal By: Draggy_
Post # 48 Aug 24, 2011
I agree with all three of you, and actually 90% of the gag, ban ratio comes from every other coven but spellcasters.
Now how bout we take a useless thread and turn it into useful entertainment? Any up for a little football this season now that they have decide to sign the contact? =D
Re: Spellcasters Removal By: kingofgames.
Post # 49 Mar 06, 2013
NO this coven should not be removed there is a lot of non fluffies and if you just remove this coven they will just join anther coven makes no sence to remove it
Re: Spellcasters Removal By: DanniBird
Post # 50 Mar 06, 2013
King, this post is a year and a half in the past. It was best left there.