I HATE to Say It, But...

Dear reader,

The following lecture will be very true, but also very dreadful. If you must, read on.

...

WE NEED WAR TO LIVE.

I really, REALLY hate to say it, but it's true. If we stop all wars, we have more mouths to feed. More mouths to feed means less food for others. And if our population keeps growing at it is and somebody figures out a way to live longer without having to eat veggies and such, we're doomed!

Then somebody will find cures for every disease and disease deaths will stop.

Somebody will eventually reach out or capture or kill every criminal, so crime rates will lower.

Somebody will have cures for all allergies, thus no or less deaths in the world.

Somebody will figure out that war needs to be stopped, thus nobody dies from wars.

Plus, a scientist even proved that if we keep growing like this, there will be no food left.

We need to cut down on the meat. We need to cut down on the chips. WE NEED A SERIOUS DIET. Eventually, all these things will happen, and our world will end turn on and off and on and off with starvation; if enough die, we eat more, then we keep reproducing, and then we run out of food again, then we repeat that.

I'm really sorry... but it's true... Unless somebody can make a spell where food appears to you, I doubt that our food sources will ever stay here.

Again, I hate to say it, but we need death in the world...

~ Tails Turrosaki

Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Death is an old friend. He is a comfort to those in pain and a staunch ally to the desparate. As without dark there can be no light, so it is without death there can be no life. I shudder at the thought of a world without Death. To live on and on with no end in sight, that is the true horror!

On the otherhand...I could do without War. War Sucks, even if he is Death's best friend.
CM

That is not which is.
The only Word is Silence.
The only Meaning of that Word is not.
Thoughts are false.
Fatherhood is unity disguised as duality.
Peace implies war.Power implies war.
Harmony implies war.
Victory implies war.
Glory implies war.
Foundation implies war.


Alas! for the Kingdom wherein all these are at war.

-Alestair Crowley

i'm glad you all are starting to see the bigger picture, for the earth to survive some will need to live and some will need to die, to get one thing another must be lost, give and recieve, the basic law of attraction, what you give is what you get, sacrafice of one life will bring life to another place, i don't mean kill people, but know in death there lies more life for all those who are willing to make it count..

it is true that some must live and some must die but what gives the political leaders the right to choose who lives or dies? im not saying i want the right or responsibility, for having such power would surely drive me insane, im merely questioning what makes them so special that they should get to send people off to their deaths.

They do not, but the Gods of the universe do, they have every full right to remove any being from existence they choose if they feel it is deserved, they just work in funny ways on level most cannot grasp.

I may not grasp that concept fully, but I can at least say this:

Even though I'm atheist, I think these "Gods of the Universe" are using life and death as a way to speak that they're there and among us; if such did not exsist, we could possibly eat a bunch of things without dying, and nothing without dying. The "Gods of the Universe" control all living and death, so, if they weren't in power for an apparent reason, the population of us would surpass the normal population that we should have, thus we could move to different galaxies without dying because there's no oxygen, we could live in toxic wastes and houses, we could go anywhere. But that would raise crime rate because they can't be killed by cops, only sent away. We couldn't be able to get hurt, we could do all possibilities, so these "Gods of the Universe" keep everything in tact and in balance.

I hate to say it, but I disagree with you, or at least I have a different POV of an addendum.

“WE NEED WAR TO LIVE.”

We don’t need war to live, in fact, everyone looses from war.

“If we stop all wars, we have more mouths to feed.”

And how is that so? I can only conclude that someone who’d come up with this conclusion is extremely influenced with the lies that Earth cannot support all of the billions of populous and more (which will eventually set the stages for the depopulation that government wants, not that we can’t support everyone, we can, just so they can continue their dictatorship plans and for this they will need to depopulate the human population) we can afford the luxury of life for every living soul on the planet. If not, would you be willing to give up your spot?

“More mouths to feed means less food for others.”

This is simply not true, just like the lie that we’re running out of oil. We can support to feed every living mouth on Earth, to an extent than what is needed.

“And if our population keeps growing at it is and somebody figures out a way to live longer without having to eat veggies and such, we're doomed!”

How if, is that we’re doomed? So, even that the fact exists, we can support every living soul, you still want to decrease the human population, and for what twisted reason may that be?

“Then somebody will find cures for every disease and disease deaths will stop.”

That would be excellent. Death will never stop, especially at the reasoning of curing all diseases, it would be better for humanity. Diseases were man-manufactured in the first place for depopulation anyway. Death can happen naturally and within time, old age and so. Diseases aren’t the only cause of death, certainly not. In the past humans lived to ages of hundreds all without diseases, but not to immortal. Death is natural, and it doesn’t need a reason to occur.

“Somebody will eventually reach out or capture or kill every criminal, so crime rates will lower.”

I may agree with that, if we were in a courtroom and discussing a case with bullet-proof evidence against the criminal. If not, would you like to be accused of a crime without proper justice, thrown into prison, shortly destined to be killed?

“Somebody will have cures for all allergies, thus no or less deaths in the world.”

If all of these cures are available, why do you still desire death? Death will occur naturally. Let the humans live, learn, and die.

“Somebody will figure out that war needs to be stopped, thus nobody dies from wars.”

Yes, it’s called peace. So you want everyone to die, and the evils of the world to continue just so people can die? That’s twisted, and deranged. We’re all going to die, but we don’t need to go about killing each other like wild retards. If we actually ever get a cure for these diseases, and can successfully stop war and have peace, why do you still have the urge to kill when death is destined to come already?

“Plus, a scientist even proved that if we keep growing like this, there will be no food left.”

No, no such thing has ever been proven. It’s been proven that if two average Joes are put in the room observing a scientific experiment, one of them were given a gun and told to shoot the other average Joe, the scientists telling them that they won’t die, it’s just an experiment, they will actually pull the trigger, Of course, under conditions of illusions. This same proving is how people use scientists to justify their crazy ideas, of course exaggerating what is actually said by scientists to make their ideas seem probable, and then there are those who are sheep.

“We need to cut down on the meat. We need to cut down on the chips. WE NEED A SERIOUS DIET. Eventually, all these things will happen, and our world will end turn on and off and on and off with starvation; if enough die, we eat more, then we keep reproducing, and then we run out of food again, then we repeat that.”

Exactly, who are you expecting to win, and who are you expecting to loose in your idea of this? Would you happily switch place with the looser?

“I'm really sorry... but it's true... Unless somebody can make a spell where food appears to you, I doubt that our food sources will ever stay here.”

Instead of writing this nonsense, you could’ve just produced extra food source for the world.

“Again, I hate to say it, but we need death in the world...”

I like to say it, we don’t. it’s just another lie purported by sheep on the internet, just another pre-reasoning before the government starts filling up their FEMA plastic coffins, for their own evil agendas which has nothing to do with world food shortages, because no such thing exists, just like the big lie about us running out of oil. My opinion, respectfully, and yours ~ undersign

Masterme...

You're not looking at the big picture.

First off, I never said that it'd be impossible to die later.

Second off, I never said that I'd like there to be war and diseases and such.

Third off, I know that disease isn't the only thing for death. I stated them all; criminality and wars and such.

Fourth off, I know it's called peace.

Fifth off, we'll run out of the items needed to produce more efficient and healthy food eventually.

Sixth off, if you read all of this, it all concludes to the world with no food.

Seventh off, a scientist really did prove this. It was announced by some science company, I didn't get many details. He proved that if society keeps growing as it is, we'll run out of food supply. But thanks to war and diseases and old age and such, we're keeping ourselves alive.

Eighth off, I didn't think I'd get this far.

“Masterme...

You're not looking at the big picture.

First off, I never said that it'd be impossible to die later.

Second off, I never said that I'd like there to be war and diseases and such.

Third off, I know that disease isn't the only thing for death. I stated them all; criminality and wars and such.

Fourth off, I know it's called peace.

Fifth off, we'll run out of the items needed to produce more efficient and healthy food eventually.

Sixth off, if you read all of this, it all concludes to the world with no food.

Seventh off, a scientist really did prove this. It was announced by some science company, I didn't get many details. He proved that if society keeps growing as it is, we'll run out of food supply. But thanks to war and diseases and old age and such, we're keeping ourselves alive.

Eighth off, I didn't think I'd get this far.”

I get the big picture/concept.

Kill half of the population to make sure the rest have their bellies filled and can enjoy the luxuries of life through greed? Who are the winners and who will be the losers?